GMS:Q&A FEMWATER: Difference between revisions
From XMS Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[GMS:Q&A_Models 1|Return to the Models Q&A Page]] | [[GMS:Q&A_Models 1|Return to the Models Q&A Page]] | ||
'''Q:''' | '''Q:''' What approaches are available for building a FEMWATER model? | ||
''(Tags: Tags)'' | <!--''(Tags: Tags)''--> | ||
:'''A:''' Direct approach, conceptual model approach, and horizons to 3D mesh approach. | |||
{{Navbox GMS}} | |||
[[Category:Q&A|FEMWATER]] | |||
[[Category:FEMWATER]] | |||
Latest revision as of 16:18, 11 December 2017
Q: What approaches are available for building a FEMWATER model?
- A: Direct approach, conceptual model approach, and horizons to 3D mesh approach.
GMS – Groundwater Modeling System | ||
|---|---|---|
| Modules: | 2D Grid • 2D Mesh • 2D Scatter Point • 3D Grid • 3D Mesh • 3D Scatter Point • Boreholes • GIS • Map • Solid • TINs • UGrids |  |
| Models: | FEFLOW • FEMWATER • HydroGeoSphere • MODAEM • MODFLOW • MODPATH • mod-PATH3DU • MT3DMS • MT3D-USGS • PEST • PHT3D • RT3D • SEAM3D • SEAWAT • SEEP2D • T-PROGS • ZONEBUDGET | |
| Aquaveo | ||
